The dog on the left is named Maya. She is a labrador retriever (field line), weighs 18 kilograms and is currently eight months old. My girlfriend and I carry the dog several times a day high in the fourth floor. We have learned that is important in the first year. Ok, but how much weight she will increase over the next months? I think: a great question to improve my skills in non-linear regression analysis!

We weigh our dog regularly on our Withings WiFi Body Scale. The data is here:

1 2 3 | mydog <- read.csv("http://holtmeier.de/public/maya.csv") mydog$DATE <- as.Date(mydog$DATE, "%Y/%m/%d") mydog$AGE <- as.numeric(mydog$DATE - as.Date("2011-05-04")) |

In line 3, I calculate the days since birth, because my approach does not work with dates. At least I do not know how. Basically, I know little to nothing about growth models of dogs. Therefore, I approach the question quite naive. I make two assumptions:

- The growth is non-linear. It is negative exponential, as it is in this example.
- The weight asymptotically approaches a genetically predetermined maximum value.

I have found the function **SSasymp** in “stats” package. The description says: “This self start model Evaluate the asymptotic regression function and its gradient It has an initial attribute that will evaluate initial estimates of the parameters Asym, R0, and lrc for a given set of data..” This is what I was looking for.

[sourcecode language=”r”]

require(stats)

fm <- nls(WEIGHT ~ SSasymp(AGE, Asym, R0, lrc), data = mydog)

summary(fm)

[/sourcecode]

The code results in the following output:

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 | Formula: WEIGHT ~ SSasymp(AGE, Asym, R0, lrc) Parameters: Estimate Std. Error t value Pr(>|t|) Asym 22.92878 0.74010 30.981 < 2e-16 *** R0 -2.59439 0.52484 -4.943 8.71e-06 *** lrc -5.07800 0.07263 -69.912 < 2e-16 *** |

**22.92878** is the numeric parameter representing the horizontal asymptote on the right side (very large values of input). So this is the estimate of the target weight for our dog (line 6, green line). Finally, I would like to visualize my data, including the regression curve. I use ggplot2 – as usual. In addition to model-based curve (line 5, red curve), I draw the model-free spline fit (line 4, blue curve). A spline fit per se does not assume a functional relationship between time and growth data (Kahm, M. et al. al., 2010).

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 | require(ggplot2) ggplot(data=mydog, aes(x=AGE, y=WEIGHT)) + geom_point() + geom_smooth(color="Blue", se=F) + geom_smooth(method="nls", formula=y~SSasymp(x, Asym, R0, lrc), color="red", se=F, fullrange=T) + geom_hline(color="green", yintercept=22.92878) + scale_x_continuous(limits=c(50,400)) + xlab("Alter (in Tagen)") + ylab("Gewicht (in kg)") |

As I said, I am still learning. Are there better ways to estimate the weight of my dog? Other models (eg the Gompertz growth function)? I am looking forward to improving information!

nice workflow – can you show the confidence intervals as bands like here: http://had.co.nz/ggplot2/stat_smooth.html

Hi Jeremy,

it’s quite easy to add the confidence interval. Just replace in line 4

geom_smooth(color=”Blue”, se=F)

“se=F” with “se=T”.

Thanks, this is helpful. I have a question:

If you were trying to fit data with a positive exponential curve, how would this differ?

Hi Michael,

First of all, this means that I get a problem with my dog… 😉

Presumably you are in search for an alternative for the function

SSasymp, right? To my knowledge, there is no alternative for this case.You have to define your own exponential model, for example, with the following formula:

`a * exp(b * x)`

Before you can fit your model, you need to specify startup parameters for

aandb. Have a look at John Fox’ paper.`Fit < - nls(y ~ a*exp(b*x), start = list(a=1, b=1))`

Thanks for the help! This would definitely cause a BIG problem with your dog

Yes, this is correct. I will try this and thanks for the article reference.

Michael

Probably it makes sense to show the distribution of the residuals?

And as for the model: there are periods of very rapid growth, one of them is superimposed on sexual maturation … Often, the linear growth of body size and weight are in antiphase.

Generally better to build the first derivative of the weight over time and watch the presence of fractures?

for this breed write “Weight 25-40 kg” probably is not sexually mature slit and all to come.

Well, I think, I should have done this. I will consider your comments when I analyze Mayas data next time.